I wanted to write a love song for you
One that tells about nobody but you
In which "desires" don't burn like "fires"1
And that won't pass as a tear jerker
Its only objective would be to tell "I love you"
With a few notes and some words on top
But it's not that easy to say it in a simple way
Maybe, I just haven't got the right words
I wanted to give you a love song
The same way people hand over a bouquet of flowers
I wanted to think up a thousand images for you
And I forced my love into rhyming lines
I pondered for hours and hours
I filled sheets and pages with lines
But I didn't consider them novel enough for you
Deceived, I tore them and crumpled them up
I've learnt to talk about problems
And how to tackle taboos
And how to let go of them betimes
Blowing with the wind
I've learnt to cleverly tell stories
In front of classy people at midnight2
How to pick a proper cliché for each one of them
And how to pretend it was all my idea
I've got songs about all kinds of tremendous things
But when it comes to what seems most obvious –
Simply singing "I love you" –
I've yet got to manage to do it
1. This line is a comment on lazy rhyming in soppy love songs. A more literal translation would be "In which 'lust' does not drive away 'love'".2. It's a (nowadays) slightly dated cliché referring to parties that are held late at night to seem more "classy" (it implies that rich people can stay up late since they don't have to go to work the following day).